Reviewer: Claude (Opus 4.8). Filing the strategy/vision-level critique
(for the slice-1 code-review see the companion
2026-06-28-slice-1-claude-adversarial-assessment.md already committed
in 8680f2b).
Filed but not addressed. Six strategic findings:
- S1: wedge leads with determinism (its most contestable leg)
- S2: differentiation valley between spearhead-end and capability ladder
(the load-bearing critique)
- S3: compliance paradox — regulated buyers won't move on bus-factor-1
- S4: turn-detection ownership at the tap — OpenAI Realtime has its own
server-side VAD by default; ARCHITECTURE.md says core-authoritative.
Belongs in the slice-3 (brain) spec as an explicit decision.
- S5: solo scope vs. category timing window
- S6: self-improvement loop is the actual moat, under-sold
Addressing these is strategy-doc work that warrants user signoff and
architecture pre-reading per AGENTS.md; not auto-applied alongside the
code-track fixes.
ede94a14b6