3.0 KiB
code-review-tea
Project-local fork of Anthropic's code-review plugin, adapted from the GitHub CLI (gh) to the Gitea CLI (tea).
Credit
This plugin is a fork of Anthropic's code-review plugin (author: Boris Cherny, boris@anthropic.com), from the claude-plugins-official marketplace. The upstream plugin is GitHub/gh-only. All credit for the review design — the 5 parallel specialized agents, confidence-based scoring, and false-positive filtering — belongs to the original. This fork changes only the Gitea contact points.
Why a fork
Vigilar is hosted on a self-hosted Gitea instance (git.adlee.work), not GitHub. The upstream code-review plugin is hard-wired to gh (its allowed-tools, PR-fetching, and comment-posting all call gh), so it cannot run against this repo as-is. This fork substitutes the five gh contact points with tea equivalents and changes code-link URLs from GitHub's blob/SHA/path#L format to Gitea's src/commit/SHA/path#L format.
Usage
On a branch with an open Gitea pull request against main:
/code-review-tea:code-review
Claude will:
- Verify the PR is reviewable (skip closed/draft/trivial/already-reviewed)
- Gather relevant CLAUDE.md files
- Summarize the change
- Launch 5 parallel review agents (CLAUDE.md compliance, bug scan, git-history context, prior-PR comments, in-code-comment compliance)
- Score each finding 0–100 for confidence
- Filter to findings ≥80
- Post a single review comment back to the Gitea PR via
tea api
Requirements
teaCLI (v0.14.1+) installed and logged in asaleeagainsthttps://git.adlee.work- The
aleelogin need NOT be the default — the command passes--remote originto resolve context - An open Gitea pull request to review
Load (this plugin is NOT auto-discovered)
A plugin placed in <repo>/.claude/plugins/<name>/ is not auto-discovered by Claude Code. Load it explicitly:
# per-session (recommended):
claude --plugin-dir .claude/plugins/code-review-tea
# persistent, user-scope (across all your projects):
claude plugin init code-review-tea # installs to ~/.claude/skills/code-review-tea/
Differences from upstream
| Area | Upstream (GitHub) | This fork (Gitea) |
|---|---|---|
| CLI | gh |
tea |
| PR metadata | gh pr view |
tea pulls <idx> --fields ... -o json |
| Diff | gh pr diff |
git diff origin/<base>...origin/<head> (local; tea pulls --fields diff returns empty in 0.14.1) |
| Comment post | gh pr comment --body |
tea api /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/<idx>/comments -F body=@- (-F typed field reads stdin; /repos/ prefix required) |
| Code link | github.com/o/r/blob/SHA/path#L |
git.adlee.work/alee/vigilar/src/commit/SHA/path#L (SHA must be remote-present) |
| Inline line comments | (upstream posts one summary comment) | NOT attempted — single summary comment only (Gitea inline-comment API needs tea api review endpoints; out of scope) |
See commands/RESOLVED_INVOCATION.md for the verified tea calls.